SpartanResource.com ~ BEATchUMps.com ~ DUMPthechUMps.com

Thursday, January 2, 2014

ATOWN PROPHECY BECOMING NEW MSU FOOTBALL REALITY

Michigan State football has answered two of the three bells hung out by our prophet, ATownAndDown, in articles he wrote for this web site in December. ATown marked the B1G Championship game and the Rose Bowl as "must-wins" if national perceptions about the Spartans were going to change for the positive moving forward.

In his first article, part of the "Front-Burner" series on this web site, ATown previewed the Ohio STATE game with this key note:
"MSU wants to have a perennial seat at the table. MSU fans gripe about how other teams and conferences get more respect and national love than the Spartans who are "just as good if not better" than those guys. Well boys and girls, here we are. We have beaten a path to the table. You want a seat... win.
"These next two games (and you might even include the Oregon game next year in here too) are crucial to changing the national perception of MSU football. We have seen years where teams put together cute seasons but when they get their seat at the table they can't back up why they deserve to keep it. That is where MSU is standing right now. If MSU wins 2 of those 3 games (B1G Champ, bowl, and Oregon 2014), people will start to be convinced. Win all and people will believe."
The Spartans accomplished that mission, but were still rated as underdogs to Stanford when the match was set, only to see the point-spread expand in the Cardinal direction as the game drew closer. ATown repeated his siren call a week before game-day, with detailed commentary such as this:
"Spartan fans need to stop settling for being just being better than mediocre. How can we as a fan base ask everyone else to change their perception of the Spartan Football Program if we can’t even change our own?
"If you want the rest of the college football world to give you the benefit of the doubt or to get selected to the more respected bowl, you have to win.  And then go out and win again. And again.
"The win over OSU is going to mean a lot less if we go and get our heads kicked in by Stanford. Suddenly that national perception is knocked back to the Stone Age. If we beat Stanford we will have some success in the postseason too.  And we are satisfied with that? 
"Being content with just making it to the Rose Bowl and not following up this season with another solid year isn’t going to be enough. I want the term “magical season” to morph into “that is MSU doing what MSU does.”
"So here we are with a seat at the table. Let’s make some noise instead of just enjoying being here."
The Spartans accomplished that mission as well, and now that those two milestone victories are in the books, the national perception is apparently beginning to show signs of progress. Consider these comments, appearing in various articles in the 24 hours after the Rose Bowl:

From Gillian Van Stratt of MLive:
"It's as if the world we once knew has been flipped on its head. When Michigan State stopped Stanford on fourth-and-one Wednesday night to win the 100th Rose Bowl, perceptions and realities -- they all changed. From coast to coast the narrative was that Michigan State football is for real, is elite and is no longer 'little' anything."
From Drew Sharp of the Detroit Free Press:
"And as the western sun set behind a glorious mountain range on this New Year’s evening so too did every last old perception of the Spartans being somebody’s weaker sibling or being incapable of shining when the national lights burn brightest. The Spartans aren’t in anybody’s shadow any longer. They’ve now formally lost usage of the lack-of-respect card. Not after winning 13 games — something Michigan’s never done. Not after beating two top-five ranked teams in their last two games. Not after finishing perhaps as high as No. 3 in the final national rankings.
From Pete Thamel of Sports Illustrated:
"There are games that flip opinions, alter reputations and change the world order. Forget the "same-old Spartans" meme or the "Little Brother" label that former Michigan tailback Mike Hart famously bestowed upon Michigan State. The victory further cemented the Spartans' status as the Big Ten's best team, a designation Michigan State earned by pushing undefeated Ohio State around in the conference title game on Dec. 7. As the locker room dance party spread from Pasadena to East Lansing, Michigan State fans everywhere basked in the victory. Cue the music, as this new era in Spartans football already has a soundtrack."
From Adam Rittenberg of ESPN:
"It happened for Michigan State early Wednesday night at the most historic setting in college football. MSU's 24-20 win against Stanford in the 100th edition of the Rose Bowl Game marked a final step, a ceiling shattered and a confirmation that the Spartans indeed belonged. The Spartans are assured of their first top-five finish since 1966. The playoff era dawns next fall, and MSU suddenly can target the Final Four not only in basketball. The Spartans found the inches and broke through ceiling. They've reached the next floor. They don't plan on leaving."

From Shawn Windsor of the Detroit Free Press:
"We hadn’t watched them on this national stage, we hadn’t watched them compete to change our perception, compete to change people’s minds, compete for so much more than a victory in the 100th Rose Bowl. Until now. Until Wednesday."
From Bob Wojnowski of the Detroit News:
"This was new territory in many ways. When dreams become real, they’re not dreams anymore. The Spartans traveled a long way for confirmation and completion, and in the most fitting way possible, that’s exactly what they got."
Everything seems to be playing out almost like a script that was written by ATown. We know he didn't actually write the script, but he observed a core element to the potential held by a strong finish to the season, and we are now all in position to reap the benefits from the MSU success. Chances are strong that Michigan State will be a pre-season Top Ten team next fall, perhaps as high as Top Five. Without a large post-season tournament to determine the national champion, starting position will remain a key ingredient to making the Football Final Four.

While we await the third bell in the
ATown game-triad, we can finally relish
an off-season during which nobody will be
surprised or aghast if Mark Dantonio
asks another reporter, "Where's the threat?"




----------
****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

TEN YEARS OF FOOTBALL WAR: MICHIGAN STATE vs MICHIGAN

The seventh season of the Mark Dantonio Era has been completed, finishing with a 10-game win streak, a conference championship, and a Rose Bowl victory. Everybody knows by now that Michigan State has out-performed and generally surpassed Michigan in football during that span, especially in the last five years.

But what about the last decade? UM fans are always heralding history, telling us that MSU has only been good recently, like it's just a passing fad or a blip on the sports screen. So let's take a look at the two programs compared to each other over the last 10 years of college football.

Wolverine fans are constantly bragging about their "all-time wins record", but to do so, they are actually counting rugby scrimmages from the late 1800s as "football". There's no way to stop those people, but we don't have to believe in their mythology.

Anyway, a decade is definitely a significant measuring stick, so here we go.


Last 10 Football Games Between MSU and UM
2013:  MSU wins by 23 (29-6)
2012:  UM wins by 2 (12-10)
2011:  MSU wins by 14 (28-14)
2010:  MSU wins by 17 (34-17)
2009:  MSU wins by 6 (26-20, OT)
2008:  MSU wins by 14 (35-21)
2007:  UM wins by 4 (28-24)
2006:  UM wins by 18 (31-13)
2005:  UM wins by 4 (34-31, OT)
2004:  UM wins by 8 (45-37, 3OT)
  • Ten Game Record = MSU 5, UM 5
  • Non-Overtime Record = MSU 4, UM 3
  • Total Points = MSU 267, UM 228 (MSU + 39)

You can see from the summary above that over the last ten years of the series, MSU "measures up" and even holds a slight lead in non-overtime games and total points. Let's continue by summarizing the season results for each team over the same decade.


SEASON RESULTS OVER LAST DECADE

Michigan State Spartans
2004:  5-7, Fifth Place, no bowl
2005:  5-6, Ninth Place, no bowl
2006:  4-8, Tenth Place, no bowl
2007:  7-6, Seventh Place, bowl loss
2008:  9-4, Third Place, bowl loss
2009:  6-7, Sixth Place, bowl loss
2010:  11-2, First Place (B1G), bowl loss
2011:  11-3, First Place (division), Bowl Win
2012:  7-6, Fourth Place (division), Bowl Win
2013:  13-1, First Place (B1G)Rose Bowl Champion

  • MSU TEN YEAR TOTAL = 78-50 (.609)
  • Current Bowl Games in a row = 7
  • Total Bowl Victories = 3
  • Current Bowl Win Streak = 3
  • Biggest Bowl Win Streak = 3
  • League Championships = 2
  • Division Titles = 2


Michigan Wolverines
2004:  9-3, First Place, bowl loss
2005:  7-5, Third Place, bowl loss
2006:  11-2, Second Place, bowl loss
2007:  9-4, Second Place, Bowl Win
2008:  3-9, Tenth Place, no bowl
2009:  5-7, Tenth Place, no bowl
2010:  7-6, Seventh Place, bowl loss
2011:  11-2, Second Place (division), Bowl Win
2012:  8-5, Second Place (division), bowl loss
2013:  7-6, Fifh Place (division) bowl loss


  • UM TEN YEAR TOTAL = 77-49 (.611)
  • Current Bowl Games in a row = 4
  • Total Bowl Victories = 2
  • Current Bowl Win Streak = 0
  • Biggest Bowl Win Streak = 1
  • League Championships = 1
  • Division Titles = 0

The differential in winning percentage equals only one game over the last ten years. If you can think of any one game in the last decade that UM might well have lost, that's the difference. Or, if you can think of any one game over the past decade that MSU barely lost, there's your gap.

Many have noticed that Michigan has scored fewer points against Michigan State in each of the past 10 seasons. Here is a look at that list:

Points Scored by UM vs MSU
2004 - 45
2005 - 34
2006 - 31
2007 - 28
2008 - 21
2009 - 20
2010 - 17
2011 - 14
2012 - 12
2013 -   6



BOTTOM LINE:  MSU has "measured up" by winning more league championships and division titles over the last decade. Michigan State has a better bowl streak in progress, as well as a better bowl-win streak. The series is tied in wins/losses, and the Spartans lead in points scored.


Every one of the ten games was a battle, not only to win
on the field, but for Michigan State to establish parity
and then supremacy. These last ten battles have
changed the face of the rivalry for years to come.




----------
****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

Rose Bowl Post-Game

My predictions are published in Countdown To Roses - The Rose Bowl by the Numbers
First, congratulations to Stanford for an outstanding season and compliments on a well-played, hard fought constest in Pasadena.

The biggest success in the analysis is the prediction that the Spartans would have a successful passing and and the Cardinal pass game would be somewhat contained. Also, that there would be drama rushing the ball, both ways was mentnioned. All of this came true in an exciting game.

Both teams played tough. Great game.

And, now comes crow time. I either get to crow or I eat crow. Either way, I am covered in roses.

Stanford Predictions:
101 yards rushing (+27/-21 yards) actual: 162 yards, 34 yards more than predicted.
147 yards passing (+41/-44 yards) actual: 143 yards.
15 points (+4/-4 points) actual: 20 points, 1 point higher than predicted.

Michigan St. Predictions:
96 yards rushing (+26/-22 yards) actual: 65 yards, 9 yards lower than predicted.
202 yards passing (+32/-54 yards) actual: 332 yards, 98 yards more than predicted.
19 points (+4/-7 points) actual: 24 points, 1 point higher than predicted.

Margin of victory predicted is 4 points, which matches the game result.

Only 1 of 6 correct but 3 others were very close calls.

Roses are wonderful. I don't think any crow is served today.

Thank you Spartans, may I have another!

****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

VIDEO: Relive Rose Bowl Hype - Spartan Pride

Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only).


























****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

MSU FOOTBALL FRONT BURNER: Rose Bowl Pre-Game Edition

BIG TEN CHAMPIONS EDITION
Our weekly feature on MSU Football brings diverse responses to
a variety of questions related to the Spartans program. 

Front-Burner was be published in three parts between the B1G Championship and the Rose Bowl

Part 1. B1G Championship Game Discussion
Part 2. MSU 2013 Season Discussion
           2A. ATownAndDown Feature
           2B. MSUSpartan76 Feature
Part 3. Rose Bowl Discussion (This Edition)

Panelists:
ATownAndDown (Follow A-Town on M-Live)
MSUSpartan76 (Follow '76 on M-Live)
SpartanMan82 (Tale of Two Programs, By SM82)
______________________________

Part 3 Discussion Questions (Readers COMMENT below the post.)
1. Does seeing the chUMps get spanked by a 7-5 Kansas State team in the BWW Bowl take anything away from the dominating win the Spartans notched against them this year?

2. To beat Ohio State, Connor Cook had to play the game of his life. What are the Spartans chances if he just has an average game against Stanford? How does the loss of Max Bullough factor in your answer?

3. I felt that Spartans "been there before" would help them in the B1G Championship Game. The shoe is now on the other foot as Stanford knows this Rose Bowl Week spectacle very well. Added in with other intangibles like time zone, travel, warm weather would you consider a win at the Rose Bowl a bigger upset than beating Ohio State? Why?

4. What are the chances that Stanford wins and it's not even close? How about the idea that MSU wins and it's not even close; more or less likely than Stanford winning by a wide margin?
______________________________

Panelist Responses

1. Does seeing the chUMps get spanked by a 7-5 Kansas State team in the BWW Bowl take anything away from the dominating win the Spartans notched against them this year?

SpartanMan82 (Tale of Two Programs, By SM82)
No, not at all, just check the record. Michigan was 6-1 when they met Michigan State in Spartan Stadium, and since that game, UM could only win one more time, in triple-overtime. MSU also gave them their worst loss of the season.

The Spartans crushed the Wolverines, in one game destroying their entire season. Kansas State was just the team that happened to draw them in the bowl game, and dispatched them accordingly.

Every team that played Michigan after November 2 had a clear "green-print" for how to pound on the Bluebloods. The KSU win was a validation of the November 2 doomsday game for UM, along with all of their other losses along the way.

ATownAndDown (Follow A-Town on M-Live)
Not at all. Bowl games are fickle creatures. There is so much that can impact the outcome that to read too far into the tea leaves is silly. When MSU faced U of M earlier this year they were a different team than the one that showed up to the bowl game. They had a starting QB and still had hopes of winning the division. You saw them stumble hard down the stretch and even saw the desperation of Hoke and Co. to spark something by going for 2 instead of tying the OSU game late. Not getting those 2 points and losing their starting QB really took the wind out of a defeated U of M team's sails by the time they faced KSU.

Since we are on the subject here is a fun factoid for you: RichRod's records at U of M were 3-9; 5-7; and 7-6 and he was fired. Hoke has gone 11-2; 8-5; and 7-6 but the Michigan Men are only at a dull roar about firing him. It would appear that RichRod was trending up and lost his job and Hoke is trending down off of what RichRod built but not a lot of folks speaking up. U of M has talent but Hoke is going to have to fall into something to have success with how fast he lost control of this team.

MSUSpartan76 (Follow '76 on M-Live)
Michigan who? The bar for Michigan State is set way much higher than just merely beating UolM. Also, that game was expected. It was predicted in this post: The Fall of UolM. The Spartans exposed UolM for what it was, something the media is just no catching on to. So, no. The KSU loss in the wings bowl was just another progression in the downward spiral.

A chUMp posted on MLive.com the following (refers to UolM wins versus MSU):
1970s 9-1
1980s 8-2
1990s 6-4
2000s 7-3
2010s 1-3

I think the trend line is obvious in that data. It does deliberately mask the 5-2 record Coach Dantonio owns and the 1-2 record owned by the chUMp coach.
---
Insert by Retrun to Glory, M-Live poster, RosesAreGreen responded to the chUMp's post and others like it with the following:
RosesAreGreen
TO ALL MICHIGAN FANS WHO HAVE POSTED BELOW:

UM has one 12 win season and 2 11 win seasons since 1986.
MSU has one 12 win season and 2 11 win seasons since 2009.
Michigan HAS NEVER had back to back 11 win seasons.
Michigan HAS NEVER won 13 games in a season as MSU has a chance to do vs. Stanford.
UM's cycle of continuous improvement vs. MSU since the Wolvies last Big 10 championship season in football (10 years and counting....)

2004 - 45 points
2005 - 34 points
2006 - 31 points
2007 - 28 points
2008 - 21 points
2009 - 20 points
2010 - 17 points
2011 - 14 points
2012 - 12 points
2013 - 6 points

Hoke's 3 teams have been outscored by MSU 67-32 (minus 35)
Rich Rod's 3 teams were outscored by MSU 95-58 (minus 37)

That's progress!!! Keep up the good work!

______________________________

2. To beat Ohio State, Connor Cook had to play the game of his life. What are the Spartans chances if he just has an average game against Stanford? How does the loss of Max Bullough factor in your answer?

MSUSpartan76 (Follow '76 on M-Live)
To beat Ohio State? Certainly Connor Cook had a career game and certainly that was a significant contribution, but I do not believe it was the passing yards and much as it was the resilience of the team that ultimately got the win.

Connor Cook will have the best game he can, come 5:00 pm (EST) on 1/1/14. We are fortunate that the Cardinal pass defense is not the best the Spartans have faced this season. Statistically, it is only marginally better than tO$U, which makes it the 11th best faced this season. tO$U, IU, Northwestern are ranked lower. The Stanford pass defense, statistically, is comparable to Youngstown State. Just as a point of reference.

Max? Max will be on the field in spirit. You can count on that.

ATownAndDown (Follow A-Town on M-Live)
I think calling it the "game of his life" is a bit a of a stretch. From a QB rating stand point it was his 5th best game of the season against a defense that ranked 11th in the B1G in passing yards allowed and 9th in the B1G in QB rating allowed. It was a solid performance on a big stage which is always good to see a guy not buckle under pressure. With that said, I am firmly in the mindset that with Bullough suspended everyone else (coaches, offense and defense) need to step their game up that much. Cook needs have another solid performance and maybe even better than B1G Championship Game. The offense needs to sustain drives to give the defense a rest from Stanford's physical offense. The offense might have to put a few extra points on the board. The offense also needs to not turn the ball over and give Stanford extra shots at the defense. Cook is integral to those things and I think giving extra opportunities to Stanford is going to be a bad thing.
______________________________

3. I felt that Spartans "been there before" would help them in the B1G Championship Game. The shoe is now on the other foot as Stanford knows this Rose Bowl Week spectacle very well. Added in with other intangibles like time zone, travel, warm weather would you consider a win at the Rose Bowl a bigger upset than beating Ohio State? Why?

ATownAndDown (Follow A-Town on M-Live)
I don't know if it will be a bigger upset. I mean it was more than OSU folks that were banking on that win. There were businesses marketing travel stuff to OSU fans to the National Championship Game even before they played us. But as far as statements go, it will be big. MSU is stepping into the heart of Pac 12 country to play a team that is highly rated and used to the atmosphere. ESPN has been pushing the 100th Rose Bowl too so there will be a lot of eyes on this one. Also, its one thing to beat the team that is perceived to be the cream of the weak B1G and its another to beat a team that is perceived to be the cream of the Pac 12. So while you are not stopping a 2 year undefeated streak and ending a teams National Championship dreams, you are still making a statement that we are legit.

MSUSpartan76 (Follow '76 on M-Live)
Well, yea, there is that big parade and Disneyland and warm weather, but the boys in green have been faced with distractions many times now. It's not like this is their first trip out of State and it certainly is not like this is their first bowl game. Would I consider it a bigger upset? To start with, I predicted the MSU win over OSU and I have predicted a MSU win over Stanford so I really can not answer this question in the context of an upset.

But it certainly will be the sweeter victory.
______________________________

4. What are the chances that Stanford wins and it's not even close? How about the idea that MSU wins and it's not even close; more or less likely than Stanford winning by a wide margin?

MSUSpartan76 (Follow '76 on M-Live)
Stanford 24 versus Michigan State 35

ATownAndDown (Follow A-Town on M-Live)
Neither team is known for running away from opponents. Both teams have only 4 wins this season of 20 points or more. Both teams also like to play a physical running offense and when they can get a lead in the second half that running game gets stronger. Defenses start to wear down and the clock starts to run down. Opponents become one dimensional and your pass rushers start pinning their ears back. So neither team runs away in the scoring column because they limit their own opportunities with this style. But because of the way they play a 10 point lead can seem like a 20 point lead.

I don't think either team opens up a large margin. I think MSU getting out to a lead early is going to help. The loss of Bullough is big because of the number of facets it impacts. Replacing a 6-4, 250 lbs guy in the middle with a 6-1, 225 is going to mean that guy is going to wear down faster than Bullough against a relentless rushing attack. If we can get Stanford in a position where they can't run as often as they would like that is going to save that guy. And if that guy in the middle can't hold up alone and needs support, Stanford has smart enough coaches to attack where those guys are supposed to be.

In my opinion, that is the linchpin for the entire game: what does MSU have to do to take pressure off that position? If the offense can get out and put some pressure on Stanford to try and move the ball down the field quicker that is one way. If Narduzzi can out chess match Stanford's attack so they are chasing holes and weaknesses that are not there any more that is another. Heck if the combo of Elsworth and Harris can somehow hold up over 60 minutes of pounding that works too. But if Stanford can attack where it wants to attack and pick up chuck yards, they will take advantage of that all day. Look at what they did against Oregon: 66 rushes and 13 passes. That is their goal and we need to figure out how to not allow it.


****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

A TALE OF TWO PROGRAMS: BULLOUGH SITS AT HOME WHILE LEWAN SUITS UP TO PLAY

Let's face it, you were brought up to believe that the University of Michigan was a "better place", weren't you? Weren't we all? The mainstream media certainly bought the story and have been delivering it for decades. Mighty Meechigan can do no wrong.

But things have changed since Gerald Ford was President. Michigan State University has grown up very nicely. The largest state-funded university in Michigan has moved into the top spot of several key measurements, very often including sports.

Today, we have a case study of two different approaches to accountability and consequences with Max Bullough of MSU and Taylor Lewan of Michigan.

Lewan has behaved like a sacrosanct diva for his whole career, committing scores of uncalled penalties for years, while running his mouth like a beer spigot in a factory bar right after shift change. He seems willing to say, or perhaps do, anything at any time in order to maintain an audience and get his way. He ignored the rule book against the Spartans on November 2, grabbing and twisting and stomping to his heart's content, and not getting called for anything. Then he apologized after the game for his misbehavior.

Now Lewan is under investigation by the Ann Arbor police department for kicking some Buckeyes around on the street after getting roughed up by the Buckeyes on the field earlier in the day. Problem is, these guys were just guys, not wearing uniforms and helmets, just sweatshirts and hats. The inside story on this incident identified Lewan clearly, and noted how the local cops were trying to protect the big guy from getting caught.

Lewan should have been flagged for numerous penalties in Spartan Stadium. Absent that, he should have been suspended by the school or the conference after the game. Now he is under police scrutiny for an assault that was committed only a few weeks ago. Michigan Coach Brady Hoke has done nothing to Lewan, and he even went out of his way to announce that Lewan would definitely be playing in the bowl game. After all, it's the last game of his storied college career.

Meanwhile, Max Bullough has been effectively kicked off the MSU team, for a transgression that we don't even know about. Since we all don't know what mistake Bullough made, we also wouldn't know about it if Bullough hadn't been suspended. In other words, to this point, Mark Dantonio was not forced into doing anything against Max Bullough because nobody knows what he did that was wrong. This was a crystal-clear chance for Dantonio to do nothing, a free pass to just protect his star player at least until after the bowl game. After all, it would be the last game of his storied college career.

But we all know that Bullough has been harshly sentenced to a shameful penitence, for a crime that has yet to be reported. It's an unthinkable scenario in a league that props up the old schools for protecting their big boys from the long arm of the law, at places like Columbus, Happy Valley, and Ann Arbor. We will one day learn what Bullough did - - - or didn't do - - - but that knowledge will almost certainly come after the Rose Bowl game is over on January 1.

Dantonio chose the hard road, enforcing team discipline as a major value over the immediate need to win a game. He walks this path alone, surrounded by peers who save their own skins at every turn, ignoring ethics and morals and values and standards like so many predators on the hunt for fresh meat. He left his most beloved player behind, as a way of stating that the team is more important than any player.

Will this rock-hard lesson in tough love and standards-based leadership be recognized for what it is, a man of power standing up for principles during the greatest moment of his competitive career? Will the clown who coaches UM football ever be held up for what he really is, and compared unfavorably to his in-state counterpart?

Does it really matter that much who wins these bowl games? The biggest plays have already been made by the coaches.




----------
****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

The Rose Bowl: Spartans Time To Change The College Football Landscape

Spartan fans need to stop settling for being just being better than mediocre. It is becoming almost epidemic leading up to this Rose Bowl.  There have been a number of us that just want to “enjoy the moment” of reaching the Rose Bowl or those that believe a 12-1 season with a B1G Championship and Rose Bowl are more important than a basketball National Championship.  How can we as a fan base ask everyone else to change their perception of the Spartan Football Program if we can’t even change our own?

I wrote about this prior to the B1G Championship Game.  If you want the rest of the college football world to give you the benefit of the doubt or to get selected to the more respected bowl, you have to win.  And then go out and win again. And again.

Well we did it.  Not only did we go out with the eyes of college football on us and beat the #2 team in the nation but we did so in an impressive manner.  There are those among us that are content now. They are “enjoying the moment” if you will. Now don’t get me wrong: I am ecstatic with the win over OSU.  Absolutely love it. But I am not content. Heck the season is not even over yet!

The win over OSU is going to mean a lot less if we go and get our heads kicked in by Stanford. And God forbid OSU gets pounded by Clemson too. Suddenly that national perception is knocked back to the Stone Age.  

Let’s skip ahead and say we beat Stanford. Does that mean we have arrived?  Everything is all good? In my opinion, there is still work to do.  Iowa won the Orange Bowl in 2009.  The following year Penn State was selected to the Outback Bowl over Iowa, despite Iowa winning the head-to-head battle.  The perception of Iowa remains the same today: a decent program that can put together a magical season every now and again. It takes more than one good season to change the perception of your program.

Those that would take this season (plus a Rose Bowl victory) over a National Title in basketball show why there is a difference between the perception of our basketball program (which is undeniably respected on a national level) and our football program. Look no further than the 2011-2012 basketball season for the proof of this. That year we started off unranked and eventually finished with a share of the B1G regular season, won the B1G Tourney and made it to the Sweet 16.  And yet look at how many of us were disappointed with that outcome because we fell short of the Final Four and ultimately a National Championship.

Now this year the results of the football team are about on par with that basketball season. Unranked to start. Ended up winning the division. Won the B1G Championship. If we beat Stanford we will have some success in the postseason too.  And we are satisfied with that? Are we just that jaded by the success in basketball or are we not demanding enough in football?

Take a second to think about which B1G teams are on that national level that we want to be. Which B1G teams get the respect we want? Ohio State. Wisconsin maybe. U of M’s brand props them up but they have slipped. Same for Nebraska.  And that’s it. But since 1998 when the BCS system was instituted, only Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana and Michigan State are the only B1G teams to not play in a BCS bowl.  Illinois has made multiple appearances and how do you feel the Illinois program looks nationally?  OSU, Wisconsin, U of M and Nebraska have a ton of appearance and even those 4 have their national perception issues (see OSU getting jumped this year despite not losing).  Being content with just making it to the Rose Bowl and not following up this season with another solid year isn’t going to be enough.

I love the success that we have had this year. It is great to point to 3 of the last 4 years with 11 or more wins.  But at the end of the day, I am still hungry. I still want more.  I want what Bama has because they are disappointed by their one loss season. I want what Texas has where they fire their coach who was one win away from a conference championship because they are not playing for National Championships.  I want the term “magical season” to morph into “that is MSU doing what MSU does.”


Those changes take time but we have another opportunity to make a statement in the Rose Bowl and then again against Oregon early next year. So here we are with a seat at the table. Let’s make some noise instead of just enjoying being here.


****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, at the bottom of the page (Web version only). Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.