SpartanResource.com ~ BEATchUMps.com ~ DUMPthechUMps.com

Showing posts with label Dantonio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dantonio. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2016

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS

A VISUAL COMPARISON OF THE PROGRAMS: 
MICHIGAN STATE FOOTBALL vs MICHIGAN


*Picture courtesy of MARK OSTERMAN from his M-Live account


---------
 ****** The purpose of this web site is to expose the mainstream media bias that consistently portrays Michigan in a favorable light under any and all circumstances. We present current facts and review historical records to show that UM is not all they are cracked up to be. This process involves information that is negative by nature, offered as a counter-balance to the biased picture we all see on a regular basis in the mainstream media. These negative facts may involve Wolverine teams, players, coaches, administrators, and/or fans. We are here to prove that Michigan is NOT AS DIFFERENT as they want us all to believe.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

WILL ANYONE IN THE SPORTS MEDIA ASK JIM HARBAUGH IF HE'S ROOTING FOR OHIO STATE?

The Michigan fan-base is bubbling with anticipation over their last home game, the traditional season-ending clash with Ohio STATE. The Bluebloods have conferred with each other, and they have concluded that this is the year that UM will send Brutus home with cleat marks on his backside. That's right, they expect to watch a team that is 12-9 over the last two seasons knock off a team that is 24-0 over the same time span.

There is no explaining the "Michigan Mentality".

The fervor is so high that their friends in the sports media have calculated for them that it would be best if OSU would defeat MSU before heading to Ann Arbor. And so the sports reporters are slowly starting to float the idea around Shembechler Hall by asking some Michigan players if they would root for Ohio STATE to defeat Michigan State, on the grounds that it would help them. But only IF they beat OSU the next week.

These questions put Wolverine players in the funny position of having to answer an embedded question that wasn't stated, i.e., will they root for the Spartans over the Buckeyes? It is somewhat implied that if they don't root for one team, they will be rooting for the other. So they could ask the question either way, or just ask if any given player has a rooting interest in that game between those teams.

But it is so much more juicy to ask if they are rooting for a rival, right? So they are starting that up, only three weeks before their game against the league-leaders.

But when will the sports media
ask Jim Harbaugh the same question?

Who among the UM-flaks hiding behind
reporters badges will have the stone-cold nuts
to pose such a question to their Lord and Master?

That's when we would know things were changing, when Harbaugh is openly asked the same type of question that Mark Dantonio has been asked for the past several years. This represents a watermark test of the sports media love for Michigan. As long as they don't throw that hardball right down the middle of the plate to the Blue Guru, they're propagating that same double-standard of coverage that we've been seeing for decades.




---------
 ****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments.   ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****



Thursday, November 5, 2015

TODAY IN chUMp HISTORY: NOVEMBER 5, 2007

To paraphrase the Beatles: "It was eight years ago today, Mark Dantonio turned the tide our way..."

That's right, it was on this date in history, eight years ago, on November 5, 2007, that Michigan State Football Coach Mark Dantonio drew his line-in-the-sand by uttering the now famous admonition, "Pride comes before the fall." We all know what has happened since that time.


The Spartans have defeated the Wolverines seven times in the eight games since then, losing only once by two points on a last-second field-goal in Ann Arbor. MSU has outscored UM by 100 points (224-to-124), winning two league titles and four bowl games along the way.

So while this event may be associated with a date in Michigan State football history, by implication it is also one of the milestone events in Michigan football history. And it has nothing to do with khakis, gatorade on cereal, or worms with machine guns.








---------
 ****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments.   ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

TEN YEARS AFTER: THE LAST DECADE OF MICHIGAN STATE vs MICHIGAN FOOTBALL

The ninth season of the Mark Dantonio Era is well underway, with the Spartans riding a 12-game win-streak and standing pat during the bye week at 8-0. Much still to be determined this year. But as we get ready to come out of the mid-season break we take a look at the football series between Michigan State and Michigan.

Everybody knows by now that Michigan State has out-performed and generally surpassed Michigan in football under Dantonio, especially in the last five years. But what about the last decade? UM fans are always heralding history, telling us that MSU has "only been good recently", as if it's just a passing fad or a blip on the sports screen. So let's take a look at the two programs compared to each other over the last 10 years of college football.

Wolverine fans are constantly bragging about their "all-time wins record", but to do so, they are actually counting rugby scrimmages from the late 1800s as "football". There's no way to stop those people, but we don't have to believe in their mythology. Anyway, a decade is definitely a significant measuring stick, so here we go.


Last 10 Football Games Between MSU and UM
2015:  MSU won by 4 (27-23)
2014:  MSU won by 24 (35-11)
2013:  MSU won by 23 (29-6)
2012:  UM won by 2 (12-10)
2011:  MSU won by 14 (28-14)
2010:  MSU won by 17 (34-17)
2009:  MSU won by 6 (26-20, OT)
2008:  MSU won by 14 (35-21)
2007:  UM won by 4 (28-24)
2006:  UM won by 18 (31-13)
  • Ten Game Record = MSU 7, UM 3
  • Total Points = MSU 261, UM 183 (MSU +78 points)





You can see from the summary above that over the last ten years of the series, MSU has taken charge, winning both big and small, both home and away. (Important to note that this "Ten-Year Picture" will not change much to favor UM the next couple of seasons, even if the Wolverines win the next two games, as the game count for the decade would remain 7-3, MSU.)

Let's continue by summarizing the season results for each team over the past decade, not including the present season which is still in progress.


SEASON RESULTS OVER THE LAST DECADE

Michigan State Spartans
2005:  5-6, Ninth Place, no bowl
2006:  4-8, Tenth Place, no bowl
2007:  7-6, Seventh Place, bowl loss
2008:  9-4, Third Place, bowl loss
2009:  6-7, Sixth Place, bowl loss
2010:  11-2, First Place (B1G), bowl loss
2011:  11-3, First Place (division), Bowl Win
2012:  7-6, Fourth Place (division), Bowl Win
2013:  13-1, First Place (B1G)Rose Bowl Champion
2014:  11-2, Second Place (division), Cotton Bowl Champion

  • MSU TEN YEAR TOTAL = 84-45 (.651)
  • Current Bowl Games in a row = 8
  • Total Bowl Victories = 4
  • Current Bowl Win Streak = 4
  • Biggest Bowl Win Streak = 4
  • League Championships = 2
  • Division Titles = 2

Michigan Wolverines
2005:  7-5, Third Place, bowl loss
2006:  11-2, Second Place, bowl loss
2007:  9-4, Second Place, Bowl Win
2008:  3-9, Tenth Place, no bowl
2009:  5-7, Tenth Place, no bowl
2010:  7-6, Seventh Place, bowl loss
2011:  11-2, Second Place (division), Bowl Win
2012:  8-5, Second Place (division), bowl loss
2013:  7-6, Fifh Place (division), bowl loss
2014:  5-7, Fourth Place (division), no bowl

  • UM TEN YEAR TOTAL = 73-53 (.580)
  • Current Bowl Games in a row = 0
  • Total Bowl Victories = 2
  • Current Bowl Win Streak = 0
  • Biggest Bowl Win Streak = 1
  • League Championships = 0
  • Division Titles = 0


BOTTOM LINE:  Mark Dantonio promised that MSU would "measure up" when he took over the job in 2007, and the Spartans have done so, by winning league championships, division titles, and bowl games. By comparison to Michigan, Michigan State has won more rivalry games, they have a better bowl streak in progress, as well as a better bowl-win streak. The series is starting to become uneven when measuring total points scored.





+++++

Care to compare these numbers from two years ago?
Click Here for a similar summary compiled just after the 2014 Rose Bowl.










---------
 ****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments.   ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****



Wednesday, October 28, 2015

A TALE OF TWO COACHES: MARK DANTONIO vs JIM HARBAUGH - - - A CASE STUDY

The Michigan fan-base continues to dwell on their latest loss, a 27-23 "upset" by Michigan State two weekends ago. The UM Coach says they've moved on to do battle with machine-gun-wielding worms, and the players say they're stoked up to turn the corner. But the lower elements of Walverine Nation continue to simmer about the so-called "gift" their team supposedly "gave to" our team on October 17.

Well then. If they are going to keep stirring the pot, then we have some more ingredients to throw in.

Remember that glazed look on Jim Harbaugh's face when the game ended, and continuing through the post-game press conference? (Of course you do, who will ever forget it!) He kept talking about "mistakes being made" and "not executing", repeating variations of both phrases several times the night of the game. Most people interpreted that commentary to mean he was pointing the finger of blame at one of his players, the punter who last touched the ball for Michigan. There has been little, if any, disagreement that Harbaugh "threw his player under the bus".

Remember that post-game press conference after the B1G Championship game in 2011, the last play of which was a punt that resulted in a roughing penalty on an MSU player to let Wisconsin run out the clock? Mark Dantonio never said anything that made anybody think that he was trashing his player for what many viewed as somewhere between a reasonable mistake and a bad penalty call.

Those are two very similar situations that led to two very different responses by two coaches. Harbaugh seemed to direct the blame at his player, leading to a public admonition of the UM fan-base to quit making death-threats to the poor kid. In contrast, Dantonio described the last play as part of a larger picture, an entire game comprised of more than 100 plays.

Here's a good story comparing the two situations in detail, an original piece from "isportsweb":





---------
 ****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments.   ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****

Friday, October 23, 2015

MICHIGAN'S KARMA PAYBACK

What is Karma?
A person's actions deciding their fate in the future. Cause and effect. A fate that ultimately balances success and failure.

UM's Karmic Debt
Even prior to the founding of the State Agricultural College of the State of Michigan, the UM arrogance was in full force. When the Michigan Legislature moved UM (then Catholepistemiad, a Jesuit college) to Ann Arbor in the year Michigan became a state, the Legislature gave UM a charter that included agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, mechanics, and a host of other educational programs that would benefit the people of Michigan. UM ignored those common pursuits and, instead, robed itself in an arrogant, elitist attitude that it would be the "Harvard of the West." The reneging of the charter led to the founding of what is now Michigan State University. UM endeavored to keep MSU from being founded.

Ever since its founding in 1855, MSU has suffered the arrogance and nefarious actions by UM, including attempts to steal its Land Grant money, its forestry program, its engineering program, and repeated moves to keep MSU out of the B1G Ten Conference.

There is a lot more, but that will be an article for another day. This is about football.

Flashback to November 3, 2007, East Lansing. It's Coach Dantonio's first game versus UM. It's midway through the 4th period. Michigan State had rallied from a 0-14 halftime deficit to take a 24-14 lead. Chad Henne went down with a twisted ankle. Ryan Mallet came in, botched the snap which bounced once right into the hands of Mike Hart who eeked out an 18 yard 1st down.

Michigan came back to win 28-24. A lucky bounce put the ball into a Wolverine's hands. It could have gone differently, but it counts all the same.

On national TV, post game, Mark Hart (the beneficiary of the bounce) inferred that Michigan had just been playing with the Spartans like an older sibling might do.
“I thought it was funny. They got excited. It’s good. Sometimes you get your little brother excited when you’re playing basketball and you let him get the lead. Then you come back and take it from him.”
Watch Hart's shifty eyes. He knew at the time it was wrong, classless, unsportsmanlike, and arrogant.
  • The school, the athletic department and the coaching staff all did and said nothing about it.
  • Current and former players, some in the NFL, use it frequently with glee.
  • The media embraced it.
  • Going into the 2013 UM-MSU game, ABC announced the upcoming program as "Michigan versus Little Brother Michigan State."
  • The expression popped up during the B1G Ten Championship game and again in the Rose Bowl by the commentators.
For 2911 days and counting, Spartans have daily suffered the Mike Hart Insult.

UM's Karmic Payback
  • Coaching carousel.
  • Lloyd Carr was ushered out.
  • Rich Rodriguez was brought in and brought NCAA sanctions down on Michigan.
  • Brady Hoke led the Ann Arbor squad to ever lower levels of success each year.
  • During the first 6 years, UM scoring has dropped, reaching a 46 year low of 6 points in 2013.
  • Lots of individual, team, and program records set -- all negative. -48 yards rushing is a UM school record.
2007: Coach Dantonio's response to Mike Hart's insult:
"It's not over. It'll never be over here. It's just starting."

Flash forward to October 17, 2015, Ann Arbor. It's Coach Harbaugh's first game versus MSU. There are 10 seconds on the clock. The score is 23-21. Michigan ball, 4th and 2 at the MSU 47. The punter fumbles the snap, gets it back and is hit. Jalen Watts-Jackson snags the airborne ball and rumbles 38 yards in for the score.

MSU came back to win 27-23. A lucky hit put the ball into a Spartan's hands. It could have gone differently, but it counts all the same. Jim Harbaugh, the "Messiah of Michigan Football," became the 7th UM coach (67 years) to lose his first game against MSU. Coach Dantonio went to 7-2 versus UM.
"There was something that week he had read several Michigan State players say — he can’t specifically recall what it was — but it stuck in his head."
Karma

2007 Michigan comeback win 28-24.

"Sometimes you get your little brother excited when you're playing basketball and you let him get the lead. Then you come back and take it from him."

2015 Michigan State comeback win 27-23.

"Sometimes you get your little brother excited when you're playing basketball and you let him get the lead. Then you come back and take it from him."
After the game, I copied a post written by a UM fan, "East Arbor," on the M-Live message boards (10/21/15).
"This is the Mike Hart curse at work. You would think that after years of annual bluster, unfounded arrogance, planting spikes, and repeated losses stretching over the better part of a decade, that the program and fan base would reflect on how foolish these sophomoric pregame antics are perceived by the prevailing opponent. But that's not likely to change - perhaps the theory is to keep it up and by the law of averages, at some point there will be a victory for the Champs of the World, at which point a decade's worth of blueballs bravado can finally be spurted into Sparty's face. But by that time, it will be nothing more than an aberration rather than some sort of kingly proclamation of elite status."

There are a few Wolverines that get it. Maybe when a tens of thousands get it Karma will get back in balance. Until then...

It's just starting.


----------
****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****

- - - TWO PUNTS - - - TWO FUMBLE RETURNS - - - TWO TOUCHDOWNS - - - TWO COMEBACK WINS - - - TWO DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS - - -

POP QUIZ:
Question - How many punt-plays in B1G Conference action last weekend
resulted in fumbles that were returned for a fourth-quarter touchdown?

We all know there was one play that matches the question above, the final play of the Michigan State versus Michigan game. That play has been called "lucky", a "gift", and a "miracle", and it has been directly credited with "winning the game" for MSU.

But there was another B1G Conference game last weekend in which a fourth-quarter touchdown scored as the result of a fumbled punt attempt, did you know about that? I'm betting you did not know this. I bet nobody you know knows this, either, as the very same play - - - occurring at a slightly different time in a different game - - - has gotten no publicity whatsoever. Both plays gave a touchdown to a team during a game-winning comeback, but this other one was not the so-called "winning play". It was the first play of the fourth-quarter, not the last play. But the team scoring on this play eventually won the game by three points on the last play (a field-goal).

The team was RUTGERS, and they scored the "quick-six" (or whatever) to close the scoring margin against INDIANA. The final score was 55-52, so the field-goal is credited with "winning the game", but the touchdown-return provided seven points that were necessary to actually win the game.

Same play, same quarter.
Same effect on the outcome of the game.
Same type of "comeback" game.
- - TOTALLY DIFFERENT PERCEPTION - - 

Read these stories from the Associated Press and CBS Sports and you will see that the touchdown-return play gets no special mention above or beyond the other touchdowns that were scored in the game. Nobody is saying that Rutgers won on a "miracle play". But it was the SAME PLAY.

Kemoko Turay scooped and scored on a bad snap
on an attempted punt, returning it for a touchdown.
(click here for recap)

It doesn't matter at what point in a game a score takes place except for the momentary effect on the game and the immediate amusement of the spectators. In the end, all scored points count the same regardless of when they were scored. To pick out the last play of the game and dub it a "miracle" is the equivalent of an optical illusion, in which our optic nerve reports incorrect data to our brain.

Two teams had comeback wins that each included a bad-snap punt-fumble in the fourth-quarter, resulting in a touchdown return for the team that won on the last play of the game. But the Spartans play has been picked out from the 129 other plays in the game as the source of a "lucky miracle", when in fact it was just one play, and it could have occurred at any point in the game with the same final effect.

Michigan fans who downgrade the final play
of our game on any grounds are merely showing
their lack of logical reasoning capability.




---------

 ****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments.   ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****









Wednesday, October 21, 2015

DANTONIO OUT-COACHED HARBAUGH

Rangers: Mission 4:10

10 seconds on the clock. Michigan with the ball on the Spartan 47, 4th and 2.

Time outs were called. The situation was discussed.

First, Cook in the 4th was 4 of 14 with 2 sacks in the 4th. Not good.

Second, neither team had much success running the ball. For the game, UM: 1.9 yds/carry. MSU: 1.8 yds/carry.

Then there was that 74 yard pass from Cook to Pendleton that might have weighed on Harbaugh's psyche.

To hear Harbaugh speak after the game, he was also concerned about possible penalties. Is it possible he recognized the number of times Lewis committed PIs on Burbridge that were not called? Maybe. Maybe not.

Fumbles could not have been a concern. Up to 59:50, UM had just one fumble on a kick-off return.

Harbaugh also would not have been concerned about an MSU field goal. After all, Coach Dantonio twice chose to go for it on 4th down rather than try the field goal. Message to Harbaugh, the Spartan kicking is not clicking. One has to wonder how much of that was deception.The failed 4th downs were at the UM 28 (1Q)  and at the UM 32 (4Q).

Last factor: O'Neill had made that 80 yard punt. It was a bit over 40 yards in the air and rolled the rest of the way. His other punts were 30, 32, 41, 37, 44, and 48.

Decision time.

Harbaugh's choices:

[1] Throw the ball.
Maybe pick up the 1st down, maybe not. The UM passing game was not doing very well, but in the 4th, Rudock was 4 of 9 with 1 sack. Incomplete and MSU gets the ball at the 47 with maybe 7 seconds left. Interception? Who knows.
Remember, time management. Remember, incomplete passes stop the clock.
Net result Hail Mary with very little time left, but the clock does not start until the snap.
It seems Harbaugh had little faith in the UM offense, especially Rudock, who was really in his first high-stakes, big-time game.

[2] Run the ball.
Either (A) to burn time or (B) to try to get the 1st down.
The running game both ways was non-existent, so the burning the clock approach would have been better than going for the 1st down. Remember, time management. Remember, only out of bounds stops the clock. Keep it in-bounds and the clock stops long enough to set the chains, then it starts again.
It seems Harbaugh had little faith in the UM offense, especially Smith, who was only 2.4 yards/carry with a long of 8 yards.

[3] Punt.
This was his choice. Punt. He set gunners. Why? He was trying to back MSU up to the goal line hoping for a 1st and 99 situation. Harbaugh did not seem to notice there was no return man for MSU. If he did, he thought it was to his benefit in pinning the Spartans at the 1, or at least inside the 10.

Time outs were called. The situation was discussed.

On 2 prior UM punts, the snap was not good and O'Neill had to take an extra half second to recover to make the punt.
On 1 prior UM punt, there was a gap coverage let down.
O'Neill was from Australian football and his punt takes a second or 2 longer than the standard US punt. This was his first high-stakes, big-time game.

Decision time.

Dantonio made his decision without deliberation. Rangers: Mission 4:10, otherwise known as Block 11. The Spartans lined up with a blitzkrieg rush planned.

Cook was on the sideline bemoaning his failure to Coach Salem. Coach Salem turned to him and said, "They will block the punt." Good call.

ESPN gave MSU a 0.2% chance of winning at that point. I gave the Spartans a 80% chance of blocking the punt.

Rangers: Mission 4:10


Ball snapped. Snap was bad. O'Neill dropped the ball and roughing the kicker rules were no longer in effect. O'Neill picked it up.

UM ended up blocking 11 rushers with 6 people. The UM gunners ran down field away from the play.

The Spartans hit O-Neill, the ball came loose, and Jalen Watts-Jackson was immortalized and hospitalized.

Some of the media (CBS, ESPN) call this "Gift 6." NFL.com called it "Quick 6." A Spartan fan called it "Jalen Break." All too much we hear it as the "Bobble in the Big House" or the "Miracle at Michigan."

Funny thing, it was the 2nd such TD on a blown punt of the day. Rutgers got one first.

Rangers: Mission 4:10 was not a miracle.


It was not a gift.
It was not luck.
It was an excellent coaching call.
It was a well executed punt block.
It was Coach Dantonio out coaching Harbaugh.

Just like he did the whole game, but that is the subject of another write-up.




----------
****** Click on NO COMMENTS (or # comments) below to enter and view reader comments. ----- Remember to check Spartan Headline links, updated real time, in the left column of SpartanResource.com (Web version only). *****Note: If you are receiving this post via automated email, you need to go to the site to view headline links and embedded videos in this post: http://spartanresource.com/ (Web version only). SIGN UP TO RECEIVE POSTS VIA EMAIL, TWITTER OR FACEBOOK IN THE RIGHT COLUMN.*****